A atuação da enfermagem na cirurgia robótica: um relato de experiência

Authors

  • Iel Marciano de Moraes Filho
  • Soraia de Souza Veras Raposo
  • Thais Vilela de Sousa
  • Lorena Morena Rosa Melchior
  • Meives Aparecida Rodrigues de Almeida
  • Thaynara Nascimento dos Santos

Keywords:

Human Operative Surgical Procedures, Surgical Nursing, Medical-Surgical Nursing, Telesurgery, Robotic Telesurgery

Abstract

Objective: report the experience of nursing practice in robotic surgery in the Da Vinci system. Method: This is an experience report about the performance of nursing in a Robotic Surgery Center of a hospital in the Federal District - Brazil. Results: A total of 426 surgeries were observed. Most urological surgical interventions (n = 344; 80.8%). The nursing staff at the studied CC works on several work fronts for the safety and success of the surgical intervention. Checks Orthoses, Prostheses and Special Materials; Robot mounts; calibrates optics of 0º and 30º; promotes training; It raises monthly robotic assistance indicators; promotes patient protection. Nursing assistance in robotic surgery, talks to the new techniques and the challenges involved in using these resources, in order to guarantee a successful surgical procedure and consequently an effective, safe and less risky treatment. Final considerations: This report, when reporting on this performance, contributes not only to the dissemination of the theme, but also invites reflection among peers on what permeates nursing care in robotic surgery.

References

Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermagem em Centro Cirúrgico, Recuperação, Anestesia, Centro de material e Esterilização (SOBECC). Diretrizes de práticas em enfermagem cirúrgica e processamento de produtos para a saúde. 7ªed. São Paulo: Manole; 2017.

Martins FZ, Dall’Agnoll CM. Surgical center: challenges and strategies for nurses managerial activities. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2016;37(4):e56945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2016.04.56945

Skinovsky J, Chibata M, Siqueira DED. Realidade virtual e robótica em cirurgia - aonde chegamos e para onde vamos? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2008;35(5): 334-337.doi. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912008000500011

Sousa CS, Bispo DM, Cunha ALM. Robotic surgery training in the perioperative nursing residency program. Rev SOBECC. 2016;21(4):198-202.

Pitassi C, Gonçalves AA, Barbosa JGP, Martins CHF. A Cirurgia Robótica nas Organizações Públicas de Saúde: O Caso do Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA). Administração Pública e Gestão Social. 2016;8(3):187-197. doi: 10.21118/apgs.v1i3.1037

Pinto EV, Lunardi LS, Trevisso P, Botene DZA. Nurse role in robotic surgery: challenges and prospects. Rev SOBECC. 2018;23(1):43-51.

Poffo R, Toschi AP, Pope RB, Celullare AL, Benício A, Fischer CH, et al. Robotic surgery in cardiology: a safe and effective procedure. Einstein. 2013; 11(3):296-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082013000300007.

Ramos AC, Domene CE, Volpe P, Pajecki D, D'Almeida LAV, Ramos MG, et al. Early outcomes of the first brazilian experience in total robotic bariatric surgery. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013;26(Suppl1):2-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202013000600002.

Martins RC, Trevilato DD, Jost MT, Caregnato RCA. Nursing performance in robotic surgeries: integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(3):795-800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0426

Valero SP, Rivera VC, Barroso NT. Surgical nursing intervention protocol in robotic surgery. Index de Enfermería. 2019;28(4): 214-8.

Sarmanian JD. Robot Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS): Perioperative Nursing Professional Development Program. AORN J. 2015;102(3):241 53. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2015.06.013

Zattoni F, Guttilla A, Crestani A, De Gobbi A, Cattaneo F, Moschini M, et al. The value of open conversion simulations during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications for robotic training curricula. J Endourol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 28]; 29(11):1282-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0435 26.

Ahmad N, Hussein AA, Cavuoto L, Sharif M, Allers JC, Hinata N, et al. Ambulatory movements, team dynamics and interactions during robotassisted surgery. BJU. 2016; 118(1):132-9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/bju.13426 27.

O’Shaughnessy PK, Laws TA, Pinnock C, Moul JW, Esterman A. Differences in self-reported outcomes of open prostatectomy patients and robotics prostatectomy patients in an international web-based survey. Eur J Oncol. 2013;17(6):775-80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.03.010

Waller J, Pattison N. Men’s experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localized prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(3-4):368-78. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12082

Downloads

Published

2020-11-23

How to Cite

Moraes Filho , I. M. de, Raposo, S. de S. V., Sousa, T. V. de, Melchior, L. M. R., Almeida, M. A. R. de, & Santos, T. N. dos. (2020). A atuação da enfermagem na cirurgia robótica: um relato de experiência. Revista De Divulgação Científica Sena Aires, 9(4), 725–730. Retrieved from https://rdcsa.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/536

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2020): REVISA

Section

Experience Report

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Divulgação Científica Sena Aires

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.

  • Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.