Collaborative interprofessional communication for patient safety in intensive care: integrative review

Authors

  • Dayara Ainne de Sousa Araújo
  • Ana Clara Dantas
  • Ana Beatriz Marinho de Medeiros
  • Pedro Henrique Azevedo dos Santos
  • João Pedro Saraiva Figuerêdo
  • Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros Araújo

Keywords:

Communication, Patient Safety, Intensive Care Units, Interprofessional Education, Review

Abstract

Objective: To identify the factors that interfere with collaborative interprofessional communication in the Intensive Care Unit. Method: integrative review, carried out using the databases: SCOPUS, Web of Science and MEDLINE/PubMed. The last date of access to the databases was September 15, 2023. Available studies that answered the research question were included. Editorials, letters to the editor, expert opinions, correspondence, summaries, reviews, book chapters, theses and dissertations were excluded. Results: With a sample of 20 articles, six factors that interfere positively and nine factors that interfere negatively in collaborative interprofessional communication in the Intensive Care Unit were identified. Conclusion: The main factors that interfere positively were: training of the interprofessional team, leadership capacity of nurses and structured models for exchanging joint information for decision-making. The main factors that interfere negatively were: interprofessional relationships that are not very collaborative in decision-making, difficulty in implementing interprofessional training and difficulty in managing roles and responsibilities.

References

Gessesse AG, Haile JM, Woldearegay AG. The nexus between physician-patient communication and health outcomes: level of patient communication satisfaction and its impact on adherence in Ethiopian comprehensive specialized hospitals. Patient Prefer Adher. 2022;16:2509-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S381937

Velásquez ST, Ferguson D, Lemke KC, Bland L, Ajtai R, Amezaga B, et al. Interprofessional communication in medical simulation: fndings from a scoping review and implications for academic medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03226-9

World Health Organization (WHO). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 [Internet]. 2021 [cited Set 12, 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032705

Nwosu ADG, Ossai E, Ahaotu F, Onwuasoigwe O, Amucheazi A, Akhideno I. Patient safety culture in the operating room: a cross-sectional study using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) Instrument. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08756-y

Chen Y, Gong Y. Teamwork and patient safety in intensive care units: challenges and opportunities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022;290:469-473. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220120

Hopia H, Latvala E, Liimatainen L. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(4):662-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327

Araújo DAS, Dantas AC. Comunicação interprofissional colaborativa para segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: revisão integrativa. Mendeley Data. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.17632/sbhnr4kwzs.1

Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372(160). doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

Arrogante Ó, Raurell-Torredà M, Zaragoza-García I, Sánchez-Chillón FJ, Aliberch-Raurell AM, Amaya-Arias A, et al. TeamSTEPPS®-based clinical simulation training program for critical care professionals: A mixed-methodology study. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023;34(3):126-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2022.10.002

Digby R, Manias E, Haines KJ, Orosz J, Ihle J, Bucknall TK. Staff experiences, perceptions of care, and communication in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Aust Crit Care. 2023;36(1):66-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.004

Häggström M, Ingelsson P, Sten L-M, Bäckström I. Success Factors for Quality and Safety of Intensive Care Unit Transitional Care – Listening to the Sharp End. Qual Innov Prosper. 2023;27(1):1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i1.1789

Matusov Y, Matthews A, Rue M, Sheffield L, Pedraza IF. Perception of interdisciplinary collaboration between ICU nurses and resident physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2022;27:e100501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100501

Shields HM, Pelletier SR, Zambrotta ME. Agreement of Nurses’ and Physicians’ Attitudes on Collaboration During the Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:905-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S370912

Yamamoto K. Association between interdisciplinary collaboration and leadership ability in intensive care unit nurses: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Res. 2022;30(2):e202, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000483

Kiessling A, Amiri C, Arhammar J, Lundbäck M, Wallingstam C, Wikner J, et al. Interprofessional simulation-based team-training and self-efficacy in emergency medicine situations. J Interprof Care. 2022;36(6):873-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2038103

Jonsson K, Brulin C, Härgestam M, Lindkvist M, Hultin M. Do team and task performance improve after training situation awareness? A randomized controlled study of interprofessional intensive care teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(73). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00878-2

Ntinga MN, Aswegen HV. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of collaborations with inter professional team members in an ICU setting. SAJCC. 2020;36(2):86-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.431

Liaw YS, Ooi SW, Rusli KDB, Lau TC, Tam WWS, Chua WL. Nurse-Physician Communication Team Training in Virtual Reality Versus Live Simulations: Randomized Controlled Trial on Team Communication and Teamwork Attitudes. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e17279. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/17279

Michalsen A, Long AC, Ganz FD, Branco DB, Jensen HI, Metaxa V. Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(9):1258-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003870

Schmutz JB, Meier LL, Manser T. How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280

Walter JK, Schall TE, DeWitt AG, Faerber J, Griffis H, Galligan M, et al. Interprofessional team member communication patterns, teamwork, and collaboration in pre–family meeting huddles in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;58(1):11-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.009

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3

Reeves S, Clark E, Lawton S, Ream M, Ross F. Examining the nature of interprofessional interventions designed to promote patient safety: a narrative review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(2):144-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx008

Stocker M, Pilgrim SB, Burmester M, Allen ML, Gijselaers WH. Interprofessional team management in pediatric critical care: some challenges and possible solutions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:47-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S76773

Foronda C, MacWilliams B, McArthur E. Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;19:36-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.04.005

Costa DK, Barg FK, Asch DA, Kahn JM. Facilitators of an interprofessional approach to care in medical and mixed medical/surgical ICUs: a multicenter qualitative study. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(4):326-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21607

Brock D, Abu-Rish E, Chiu C-R, Hammer D, Wilson S, Vorvick L, et al. Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89:642-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-000952rep

Reader TW, Cuthbertson BH. Teamwork and team training in the ICU: Where do the similarities with aviation end? Crit Care. 2011;15(313). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10353

Boll B, Neandrup JH, Reifarth E, Borrega JG. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication in intensive and emergency care. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022;117(8):588-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-022-00955-z

Nieuwoudt L, Hutchinson A, Nicholson P. Pre-registration nursing and occupational therapy students' experience of interprofessional simulation training designed to develop communication and team-work skills: A mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;53:103073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103073

Aldawood F, Kazzaz Y, AlShehri A, Alali H, Al-Surimi K. Enhancing teamwork communication and patient safety responsiveness in a paediatric intensive care unit using the daily safety huddle tool. BMJ Open Qual. 2020(9):e000753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000753

Oliveira EM, Andolhe R, Padilha KG. Patient safety culture and incidents recorded during nursing shift changes in intensive care units. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022;34(3):386-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220446-pt

Firmino JSC, Amante LN, Anders JC, Girondi JBR, Trombeta AP, Oliveira MC, et al. Shift handover, effective communication, and the sbar method, in the perception of nurses in a coronary care unit. Rev Min Enferm. 2022;26:e-1435. doi: https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2022.39241

Muller M, Jurgens J, Redaèlli M, Klingberg K, Hautz, WE, Stock S. Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202

Liu P, Lyndon A, Holl JL, Johnson J, Bilmoria KY, Stey AM. Barriers and facilitators to interdisciplinary communication during consultations: a qualitative study. BMJ Open.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

Araújo, D. A. de S., Dantas, A. C., Medeiros, A. B. M. de, Santos, P. H. A. dos, Figuerêdo, J. P. S., & Araújo, J. N. de M. (2024). Collaborative interprofessional communication for patient safety in intensive care: integrative review. Revista De Divulgação Científica Sena Aires, 13(3), 712–723. Retrieved from https://rdcsa.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/283

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): REVISA

Section

Literature Review

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Divulgação Científica Sena Aires

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.

  • Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.