Preferences and expectations of patients in clinical trial about laboratory exams at home and remote tests
Keywords:
Patients, Clinical Trial, Residence, Specimen Handling, TelemedicineAbstract
Objective: To understand the acceptance of clinical trial patients regarding in-house exams, remote tests and teleconsultations, revealing their preferences and expectations Method: Qualitative, exploratory-descriptive study, with in-depth interviews involving health professionals (specialists) and patients, with and without experience in clinical trials, with subsequent validation of the constructs through a participatory workshop. Results: For clinical trial patients, acceptance was relative. Several factors influence their preferences and expectations, the main ones being: a) The degree of reliability in the processes and the accuracy of the results of home exams. b) Remote tests, although well accepted, depend on the ability of the patient to understand the correct handling of the required technology. c) Teleconsultation, already well used and accepted, does not completely replace the face-to-face meeting with the doctor in critical phases. The preference is for the balanced use of “in person versus remote”. Conclusion: Acceptance is influenced by several variables. Adequate strategies must be defined for each case, to ensure safe and reliable results, with a balance between face-to-face and remote, through the active participation of patients in decision-making.
References
Rodrigues KC. A era da experiência dos pacientes. GV Executivo. 2019; 18(1):16-19. doi:10.12660/gvexec.v18n1.2019.78186
Amorim KPC et al. Perfil e vozes dos participantes de pesquisas clínicas no Brasil. Rev. Bioét. 2020. 28(4):664-673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422020284430
Lalanza S et al. Patient and Healthcare Professional Insights of Home-and Remote-Based Clinical Assessment: A Qualitative Study from Spain and Brazil to Determine Implications for Clinical Trials and Current Practice. Adv Ther. 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02441-0
Savassi LCM. Recomendações para a Atenção Domiciliar em período de pandemia por COVID-19: Recomendações conjuntas do GT Atenção Domiciliar SBMFC e da ABRASAD. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2020;15(42):2611. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2611
Catapn SC, Calvo MCM. Teleconsulta: uma Revisão Integrativa da Interação Médico-Paciente Mediada pela Tecnologia. Revista Brasileira De Educação Médica. 2020. 44 (1): e003; doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.1-20190224
Palmeira CS, Mussi FC, Santos CAST, Lima ML, Ladeia AMT, Silva LCJ. Effect of remote nursing monitoring on overweight in women: clinical trial. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2019;27:1-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2651.3129
Tran NK, Kost GJ. Diretrizes para testes domiciliares em tratamento primário: Instrução, integração, informação, limitações e indicações. Poin of Care [Internet]. 2006 [cited May 28, 2022];5(4):1-21. Available from: https://www.saudedireta.com.br/docsupload/1340371800POCT.pdf
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 9th ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2006.
Organização Panamericana de Saúde (OPAS). Boas práticas clínicas: documento das Américas. Proceedings of the 4th Conferência Pan-Americana para harmonização da regulamentação farmacêutica [Internet]; 2005 March 2-4 [cited May 28, 2022; República Dominicana. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/boas_praticas_clinicas_opas.pdf
Schultze A, Akmatov MK, Andrzejak M, Karras N, Kemmling Y, Maulhardt A, et al. Comparison of stool collection on site versus at home in a population-based study: feasibility and participants' preference in Pretest 2 of the German National Cohort. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57(11):1264-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-2051-z
Borders AEB, Grobman WA, Amsden LB, Collins ET, Holl JL. Factors that influence the acceptability of collecting in-home finger stick blood samples in an urban, low-income population. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(1):100-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2007.0004 .
Costa EO, Bifano ACS. Idosos e tecnologia: uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Estud interdiscip. envelhec. 2017;22(2):113-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.65329
Carmo FS. Inclusão Digital para Idosos: integrando gerações na descoberta de novos horizontes. FIOCRUZ [Internet]. 2017 [cited May 28, 2022]. Available from: https://saudedapessoaidosa.fiocruz.br/pratica/inclus%C3%A3o-digital-para-idosos-integrando-gera%C3%A7%C3%B5es-na-descoberta-de-novos-horizontes
Catapan SC, Calvo MCM. Teleconsulta: uma revisão integrativa da interação médico-paciente mediada pela tecnologia. Rev. bras. educ. méd. 2020;44(1):e003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.1-20190224
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Divulgação Científica Sena Aires

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
