Preferences and expectations of patients in clinical trial about laboratory exams at home and remote tests

Authors

  • Viviane Barrére Martin Taffner
  • Nancy Itomi Yamauchi
  • Kelly Cristina Rodrigues
  • Andreia Lemos Gil

Keywords:

Patients, Clinical Trial, Residence, Specimen Handling, Telemedicine

Abstract

Objective: To understand the acceptance of clinical trial patients regarding in-house exams, remote tests and teleconsultations, revealing their preferences and expectations Method: Qualitative, exploratory-descriptive study, with in-depth interviews involving health professionals (specialists) and patients, with and without experience in clinical trials, with subsequent validation of the constructs through a participatory workshop. Results: For clinical trial patients, acceptance was relative. Several factors influence their preferences and expectations, the main ones being: a) The degree of reliability in the processes and the accuracy of the results of home exams. b) Remote tests, although well accepted, depend on the ability of the patient to understand the correct handling of the required technology. c) Teleconsultation, already well used and accepted, does not completely replace the face-to-face meeting with the doctor in critical phases. The preference is for the balanced use of “in person versus remote”. Conclusion: Acceptance is influenced by several variables. Adequate strategies must be defined for each case, to ensure safe and reliable results, with a balance between face-to-face and remote, through the active participation of patients in decision-making.

References

Rodrigues KC. A era da experiência dos pacientes. GV Executivo. 2019; 18(1):16-19. doi:10.12660/gvexec.v18n1.2019.78186

Amorim KPC et al. Perfil e vozes dos participantes de pesquisas clínicas no Brasil. Rev. Bioét. 2020. 28(4):664-673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422020284430

Lalanza S et al. Patient and Healthcare Professional Insights of Home-and Remote-Based Clinical Assessment: A Qualitative Study from Spain and Brazil to Determine Implications for Clinical Trials and Current Practice. Adv Ther. 2023. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02441-0

Savassi LCM. Recomendações para a Atenção Domiciliar em período de pandemia por COVID-19: Recomendações conjuntas do GT Atenção Domiciliar SBMFC e da ABRASAD. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2020;15(42):2611. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2611

Catapn SC, Calvo MCM. Teleconsulta: uma Revisão Integrativa da Interação Médico-Paciente Mediada pela Tecnologia. Revista Brasileira De Educação Médica. 2020. 44 (1): e003; doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.1-20190224

Palmeira CS, Mussi FC, Santos CAST, Lima ML, Ladeia AMT, Silva LCJ. Effect of remote nursing monitoring on overweight in women: clinical trial. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2019;27:1-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2651.3129

Tran NK, Kost GJ. Diretrizes para testes domiciliares em tratamento primário: Instrução, integração, informação, limitações e indicações. Poin of Care [Internet]. 2006 [cited May 28, 2022];5(4):1-21. Available from: https://www.saudedireta.com.br/docsupload/1340371800POCT.pdf

Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 9th ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2006.

Organização Panamericana de Saúde (OPAS). Boas práticas clínicas: documento das Américas. Proceedings of the 4th Conferência Pan-Americana para harmonização da regulamentação farmacêutica [Internet]; 2005 March 2-4 [cited May 28, 2022; República Dominicana. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/boas_praticas_clinicas_opas.pdf

Schultze A, Akmatov MK, Andrzejak M, Karras N, Kemmling Y, Maulhardt A, et al. Comparison of stool collection on site versus at home in a population-based study: feasibility and participants' preference in Pretest 2 of the German National Cohort. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57(11):1264-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-014-2051-z

Borders AEB, Grobman WA, Amsden LB, Collins ET, Holl JL. Factors that influence the acceptability of collecting in-home finger stick blood samples in an urban, low-income population. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(1):100-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2007.0004 .

Costa EO, Bifano ACS. Idosos e tecnologia: uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Estud interdiscip. envelhec. 2017;22(2):113-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.65329

Carmo FS. Inclusão Digital para Idosos: integrando gerações na descoberta de novos horizontes. FIOCRUZ [Internet]. 2017 [cited May 28, 2022]. Available from: https://saudedapessoaidosa.fiocruz.br/pratica/inclus%C3%A3o-digital-para-idosos-integrando-gera%C3%A7%C3%B5es-na-descoberta-de-novos-horizontes

Catapan SC, Calvo MCM. Teleconsulta: uma revisão integrativa da interação médico-paciente mediada pela tecnologia. Rev. bras. educ. méd. 2020;44(1):e003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.1-20190224

Published

2023-04-12

How to Cite

Taffner, V. B. M., Yamauchi, N. I., Rodrigues, K. C., & Gil, A. L. (2023). Preferences and expectations of patients in clinical trial about laboratory exams at home and remote tests. Revista De Divulgação Científica Sena Aires, 12(2), 399–408. Retrieved from https://rdcsa.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/150

Issue

Section

Original Paper